A MASTER SOMM, RAJAT PARR WINES AND MORE.

Stan The Wine Man TV is gaining steam and for all of you out there that are watching my wine videos I want to take a moment and thank you for your support. This is an adventure I’ve been contemplating for a couple of years and it is nice to have it rolling for over a year now. I have recorded 190 videos related to wine, including wine reviews and interviews with key people in the wine world, wine makers, distributors and a Master Sommelier. I am looking forward with keen anticipation to what lies ahead for me in this endeavor.

Here a just a few episodes that should give you a taste for what I am doing. I would also appreciate it if you would subscribe to my channel so that you can easily access any new episodes that I put out there. I love to teach and talk about wine, and this is just another avenue for me to share this passion….Check it out!

Cheers!
Stan The Wine Man

Posted in Main | Leave a comment

WHAT KIND OF WINE CRITIC DO I WANT TO BE?

I’ll answer that immediately by saying that I want to be a working wine critic. I would love to be rich and if an opportunity presents itself, trust me when I tell you that I would jump all over it. I have entrepreneurial tendencies, but of the two businesses that I started, one did very well, and as for the other, I went another direction before I could see the fruits of my labor. Neither of those ventures made me rich, but they were great experiences non-the-less.

I have become an established wine critic, although on a small-scale for now, and I hope with a lot of hustle and determination I can put myself on the map as a respected wine dude. I have two wine blogs, a YouTube channel and a full-time job as a wine steward in a very busy store in a tourist destination area. I have thought long and hard about whether or not to become a full-time critic, and thrust myself head-long into writing about wine and traveling the globe in search of stories about the subject. For now, I have decided against that direction for one main reason. I do not want to be at the beck and call of those who sponsor wine trips and send samples to me.

Being on the retail side of things gives me certain liberties that are not available to those who depend on PR companies or wineries who send samples. I have 8-10 sales reps who are more than eager to put samples in front of me on a weekly basis in hopes of getting a shelf spot, a stack on the floor, or especially my “Pick of the Month”. I have no reason to favor one over the other. I like them all, and appreciate their efforts in getting wines for me to try. I am under no obligation to do anything special for any of them.

I believe that Robert Parker Jr. had the right idea in the early days, when he put out a newsletter that did not depend on any outside advertising. As far as all of us know, he funded his own ventures, using his own money that he earned in his lawyer days. We know how things turned out. He became an icon in the wine world, and his periodical The Wine Advocate became the wine bible for many consumers and those in the wine business. He claimed that he never took anything from wineries (sans samples), and as a result, all his reviews were unbiased and not tainted by graft. In later years, some of his contributing writers were found to have excepted gratuitous offers from PR companies and wineries. Although Robert himself was never accused of excepting graft from anyone, the fact that his employees did so made it hard for him to recover from the repercussions (anyone remember the name Dr. Jay Miller?).

I have never liked the idea of someone expecting something from me, in exchange for whatever it is they have to offer. By having a job or business, it allows me the freedom of choice without obligating me to review a wine in a positive light in order to receive incentives in the future. If I don’t like a wine, I will publish it or say it on my YouTube channel. If the winery doesn’t like it, too bad ( fortunately, this doesn’t happen too often). I have many other wines to review without any obligation to anyone. Why? I am in retail, putting me in the driver’s seat. For a wine critic, it is very important to be the driver, not the passenger.

The Wine Spectator is a classic example of the tail wagging the dog. I have a lot of respect for what the Spectator has accomplished over the years, but the fact that they have so much advertising in their journal, certainly taints their efforts. If they think otherwise, they are fooling themselves. How do they lure wineries into advertising in their magazine? I am sure the exposure is part of it, but how about a couple of good reviews? When they put the Marival Rose` in their “Top 100” wines for 2013 (the Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie effort), it was obvious to me that they were looking for an article or advertising from a couple that could certainly boost their popularity. I tasted the rose` and it was good, but hardly qualified to be in the top 100 (I know wine is subjective, but in this case the motive was obvious).

For critics that are full-time (unless they have a lot of dispensable income), to go on global wine adventures and to feature wine stories on wineries around the world, they have to depend on PR (Public Relations) companies or wineries to foot the bill. Is it right for a critic to accept such offers? It depends on how seriously you take what they are writing. Do you follow them because you like their style of prose and their personality? Or, do you really respect them for their objective approach to what they are tasting and grading or scoring in regards to wine? You are the judge, not me.

As far as how I feel about myself, I prefer to be a critic who is in a paying job where wineries are trying to get a space on my floor or shelf. I have accepted certain things from some of my distributors with the understanding that nothing is to be expected in return, simply because I do not depend on them. I will be the first to admit that it is a hard-line to draw, especially when you are friends with the person who is selling you the wine or the winery owner or the wine maker. Like most critics that I know, the main objective is to give our audience a candid estimation of the wines we try, no matter how the winery, distributor or wine maker feels. I feel quite honestly that a critic that doesn’t depend on incentives from PR Companies or wineries will do a much better job of reviewing wines with an honest palate.

Cheers!
Stan The Wine Man

Posted in Main, Stan UnCorked... | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

FRIDAY’S THIRTEEN…

A boatload of wine

A boatload of wine

In a weeks time, I taste a boatload of wine (seriously). I lot of my friends think that I’m lucky. Well, they’re right, and I wouldn’t give this job up for the world. The only thing that makes my job hard, is my feeling of responsibility to taste the samples given to me as quickly as possible and to put my reviews either in my Moleskine, on my Youtube channel (Stan The Wine Man TV), or right here on Stanthewineman.com. Here for your reading pleasure, are thirteen wines that I have reviewed in my Moleskine (good or bad), this past week.

2012 Chateau Camarsan Bordeaux (Bordeaux, France)… $10.

Cranberries, currants and worn leather show up on the nose with a touch of forest floor. Almost a SweetTart element coming through. Bright, tight acidity on the palate (pucker up baby), with notes of cranberries, worn leather and tobacco up front. The acid component stays strong front to back finishing with leather, cranberries and tobacco with a dash of violets. This baby has good structure, and may calm down on the acid side in a couple of years as the fruit integrates. (C+)

2010 Jason Stephens Estate Merlot (Santa Clara Valley, CA)… $17.

Just a touch of funk on the nose joined by notes of perfumed cherries, ripe currants and a hint of tobacco. Ripe dark currants on the palate with loads of spice and tobacco. Nice balance of acidity and fruit with good structure. The finish is cinnamon driven joined by notes of leather, licorice and tobacco with just a touch of veggie. (B-)

2011 Ventisquero “Grey” Carmenere Trinidad Vineyards (Maipo Valley, Chile)… $20.

Licorice, cherries bark and green bell pepper on the nose with just a hint of menthol. Solid core of currants and cherries on the palate with a back-drop of white pepper and baking spices and a touch of blueberry. A hint of green bell pepper and asparagus join the party on the mid-palate leading into a long-ass finish. Excellent structure to this wine with a nice spine of acidity. Very drinkable now, but will age nicely over the next 5-8 years. (A)

2013 Milbrandt Vineyards “The Estates” Viognier (Wahluke Slope, WA)… $18.

Pears, pears, pears on the nose…Some Asian, some Bartlett. There is almost an oily quality on the front of the palate with notes of tangerine up front, joined by lemon in the middle leading into a long, citrus driven finish. This is like a tale of two wines. Viscosity up front with a leaner style finish. This baby would be very versatile with food. Try fish, try shellfish, try fowl try some Asian noodles. I think it will work with them all, besides the fact that it’s delicious. (A-)

2013 Ventana Chardonnay (Arroyo Seco, Monterey, CA)… $13.

Very tropical on the nose with notes of pineapple and apple coming through. Good weight on the palate with notes of butterscotch, pineapple and a backdrop of crisp apples. Apple notes are prominent on the mid-palate with butterscotch notes lingering on the finish. Fresh acidity keeps everything lively on the palate driving the flavors into the finish with just a touch of toast. This is one of those chards that will fit a lot of people’s preferences. (B+)

2012 Moss Roxx Ancient Vines Zinfandel (Lodi, CA)… $20.

Ripe currants and licorice all day on the nose with a touch of brown sugar and rubber boot. Smooth and delicious notes of ripe currants and brown sugar backed by a nice core of acidity. Although it has a lot of ripe fruit notes, the acidity keeps it in check with notes of red flowers and a little tar action. The finish is clean with a little menthol and white pepper showing up on the scene. (B-/B)

2011 Maggio Family Vineyards Merlot (Lodi, CA)… $10.

Aromas of ripe black currants, dark cherries, candied licorice and black raspberries. Polished currant notes hit the front of the palate with an edge of black licorice. Violets join up on the mid-palate with a little black raspberry showing up on the grippy finish. Structured tannins support the fruit with a backbone of solid acidity. (B-)

2011 Vidal-Fleury Cotes-du-Rhone (Rhone Valley, France)… $14.

Interesting aromas of roasted meats, leather, currants, coffee and plums (try to get at least 3 of those for practice). Currants and blackberries on the palate with fresh acidity backing it up. Violets hit the mid-palate on smooth tannins with crushed rocks showing up on the bright, fresh finish. 65% Grenache, 20% Syrah, 10% Mourvedre, 5% Carignan (C+/B-)

2012 Maison Des Chartrons Barons Des Chartrons Bordeaux (France)… $9.

Aromas of cherries and currants with a touch of worn leather and a little dirt. Bright cranberries and tart cherries hit the palate with a little worn leather and baked earth. This is a high acid Bordeaux making it a little mouth puckering. Crushed violets linger on the back-end. This has all the elements of a good Bordeaux, just a little too much acidity for me. (C-)

2013 Groth Sauvignon Blanc (Napa Valley, CA)… $21.

Steely on the nose with notes of grape seeds, grape skins and apples. Apple and wood notes on the front of the palate with hits of grass and melon. Apple notes continue on the mid-palate leading into a kind of funky burnt wood sort of finish. Medium acidity keeps it from being even close to laser sharp. I’m not a huge fan of oak aged Sauvignon Blanc, and this one doesn’t help the cause. (C+)

2011 Chateau La Barron “Coste Lise” Corbieres (Corbieres, France)… $15.

Very old world on the nose with notes of bark, tobacco, currants and hints of rust and red flowers. Solid fruit notes on the palate with an old world attitude. Notes of currants and blueberries come through backed by notes of crushed rocks, leather and a touch of rust and old wood. Structured, approachable tannins with solid acidity that is well-integrated. This will age nicely over the next five years. (B+)

2011 Iuli Rossore Barbera del Monferrato Superiore (Piedmont, Italy)… $24.

Another old world nose with notes of black olives, red currants, cherries, rust and rose petal with a touch of violets and bark. Solid core of acidity that is integrated nicely with notes of cranberries, blueberries, rust and violets. Very tight, but still in the delicious category. Bright, bright, bright, rusty finish with some baked earth components coming through. This is a baby, and has great potential…Give it five years. Love the true to northern Italy style. 100% Barbera (B/B+)

2013 Cantine del Indie Langhe Rosso “Vin Rosso di Popolo” (Piedmont, Italy)… $15.

Aromas of sweet cranberries and cherries, joined by notes of violets, rose petal and a touch of Cinnamon Imperials. Rusty, acidic baked earth notes on the front of the palate joined by red flowers and cranberries. Very, very old world. Notes of green olives show on the surprisingly pleasing, red flower driven finish. (B-/B)

Cheers!
Stan The Wine Man

Posted in Main | Leave a comment

176 EPISODES ON YOUTUBE AND MOVING ON…

As I learn the ins and outs of the internet and YouTube, I am thankful for the handful of you that are watching the episodes that I am putting out there on Stan The Wine Man TV. There are things that I can do to increase traffic, and I am slowly learning what to do to improve not only the viewership, but the content.

My son Micah has jumped in to help me record some of the episodes and that has been really helpful…Having an audience and interaction with someone behind the camera. One thing that helps immensely is having subscribers to my channel. If you can find it in your heart to go to my episodes and hit the subscribe button. It’s easy to do, and it doesn’t obligate you to watch every video I put out there. I am putting a few links to some of the episodes that I am proud of. Take a look and see if they are helpful and educational. My goal is to put some great content out there that is entertaining and useful. If you have any suggestions as to how I can improve on what I am doing, please share those with me either through email stan@blucid.com or by making a comment on my YouTube channel.

Please sit back and enjoy a few of my favorite episodes on Stan The Wine Man TV…

Cheers!
Stan The Wine Man

Posted in Main, Stan UnCorked... | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment